Recently I was watching a tv show where a lapsed Catholic
went into the confession booth and said: “Forgive me father for I have sinned,
it’s been 13 years since my last confession.
I have…” After a life time of
just finding the concept of confession odd (probably because I did not and
still don’t believe in sin) I watched this scene with a certain envy. It seemed like a comforting idea to be able
to go somewhere and confess that you have strayed from your connection from
God, and to ask to have that connection restored. I guess readers’ you will hear this Quaker’s
confession.
Quakers have a historic concept of outrunning one’s leading,
or one’s light – as I have explained in a previous post. In that post I explain the idea that God can
give us a leading but that Quaker’s of old had a clearness committee or now
called anchor committee of elders appointed to support their ministry. These elders were to hold them accountable and
be a source for them to turn to for grounding so the ministry would not wander
from its source, and become ego driven or over taken by worldly
considerations. The phrase out running
one’s leading or light meant that you tried to do more than you were given
light or divine direction about.
Two and half years ago I founded a chapter of a climate
change organization in the city I live in.
I had been operating under a leading to do climate change work for
years, and the way the pieces fell together to start the group was also very
clearly a leading. It had all the
hallmarks of way easily falling into place, doors opening before you could even
ask, etc. In the first year of the group
we did amazing stuff and I had the peace and contentment one has when on the
proper path. The inner leadership of the
group was an odd assortment of personalities, but I felt a little like Jesus
who had collected a strange assortment of fisherman, prostitutes, and sinners,
as his inner circle with which to do amazing work. (I did not feel like Jesus, just to be clear,
only that my process of collecting people felt as random.)
But then to my heartbreak the infighting started. Because I knew I had been lead to create
this group and because I could already see the powerful difference the group
could/did make I instinctively felt protective of it. I would argue and fight with those on our
leadership team who I felt were taking us in the wrong direction. I only ever had 20 to 25 hours a week to
spend on the group, while some members were spending 40+ hours on it. So in my free time (the 20 to 25 hours) a
week I would rush like a mad person – to the extent that my closest friend said
in exasperation one day “No Lynn, it is not just getting through this up coming
action/event…perhaps you have not noticed you have been going at this pace for
over a year. Being over busy is a form
of spiritual disobedience.” I heard her,
but I still felt caught on a treadmill I could not exit.
As I prepared to write this blog I see the previous blog
about outrunning one’s leading written a whole 10 months before. I see the one I wrote about giving testimony
where I recognize that I had spoken cleverly while giving public testimony,but
not as lead. In my July blog post I even spoke
about my realizations that the ways in which I have learned to do Quaker
process do not work well outside of Friends Meetings – and that was one of the
many struggles I was having on how to be a faithful Quaker doing this work in a
secular setting. I go on to say: "I now have a better way, but I will need a Quaker committee of elders or anchor committee, so I do not get lost in ego or blindspots by this way of trying to lead. In general the American public does not see the search for Truth as part of the work of life. " But I did not do that. Why? This is not an excuse, but it is true. Like many Meetings in America right now mine
is of shrinking size. The active
members struggle to take care of a Meeting House, and to do pastoral care for
our aging members increasingly in ill health.
How do I ask an over stretched Meeting to create an anchor committee for
me? But I am clear now that for any
future climate work I do that I will have to…or again I will be over extended
beyond my light.
So I sort thought about my experience as that I and one of the
leadership were having a lot of fights.
(Looking back I wonder why I did not look for that of God in her despite
her atheism.) I failed to notice till the very end that it was actually a power
struggle. That she was trying to pull
certain things away from me, to go around me, and to minimize my position as
coordinator of the group. I reacted
instinctively to protect, to defend, to deflect which I thought just meant I was
always being pulled into conflict, but really meant I was in the power struggle
just defensively and unconsciously so.
My brain was increasingly trying to figure out what to do, how to
counter her next move…caught in a big chess game – something which in no way
resembles a faithful walk.
Increasingly, I was wearing armor whenever I was engaging my
leadership team, which due to email meant many times a day in my own home. When you have to put on armor that many times
a day, it eventually does not come off. Thankfully, I can say I never became
mean, vindictive or attacking. But at
some point I realized that I was becoming a different person because I was
living inside my armor with my heart locked away, becoming a person I did not
want to be. When it reached its height I walked away and left rather than
demand that everyone take sides and engage in an all-out war. Which meant I took the pain, and the loss on
myself…and that I got to take the armor off.
Why was I outrunning my light? I was
returning to activism after a several decades long break to raise my
child. Activism was from a time in my
life where mostly I did secular activities – my faith-life strongest in other
times of my life. These two parts of me
existed separately and without integration.
I was lead to start a secular organization – a puzzling thing from the
start. But I don’t live on the East coast
in a thicket of Quaker population. There
were in fact in my whole large city no Quaker’s I could even pull into my
secular group. Like so many Quakers
whose work life takes place in a secular setting I just saw this as a natural
development, but not as a danger to faithfulness. And I think perhaps if I had done it a
different way, it could have been done faithfully. Looking back I can notice I would have needed
to pray about everything I did, all my own personal decisions made within my
group. And I know I would have to have
an anchor committee.
Right now I am in spiritual recovery. I am slowing down enough to be able to hear a
still small voice again. I have stepped
away from my group so that the chess game in my head will finally shut
off. I am noticing the nudges I had, but
was completely distracted from by choosing other paths that the power struggle
required. I am divesting of tasks I took
on out of duty or responsibility, but not out of leading. I am deciding that like Quakers of old that would
come to a cross roads and wait until they discerned which way to go, that I can
take steps slowly and wait for the next step till I have Light. Because while the planet melting has urgency,
God’s timing is always deliberate and perfect. I am re-deciding that I will
move at a pace that includes self-care, play and fellowship even if it means I
get “less done.” I suspect less will
become more; that what I will do will be more effective. Certainly if God is in charge it will be!
No comments:
Post a Comment